A company known for its powerful engineering capabilities, Packard introduced its own automatic transmission in 1949.
In its heyday, the Packard Motor Car Company was known not just for its fine cars, but for its prowess in advanced engineering. Packard was a pioneer in V12 and straight-eight engines, in aviation and marine power, and the hypoid drive axle. While Packard introduced its first automatic transmission in mid-1949, its work on the development actually began 25 years earlier, using tools like the twin-dynamometer test rig ahown above.
For an independent automaker, Packard’s engineering capabilities were as robust as any. The famed Rolls-Royce/Packard Merlin aircraft engine of World War II is just one example. When Ford and Studebaker developed their automatics at around the same time, they relied on manufacturing giant Borg-Warner for technical support. For the Ultramatic, Packard performed all the work in-house under the direction of chief engineer Forest McFarland.
Ultramatic was introduced in mid-1949 on the flagship Custom Sedan, then adopted across the board at Packard in 1950 as an extra-cost option. Much like the Buick Dynaflow or the Chevrolet Powergilde, the Ultramatic was a torque converter-based automatic. That is, it relied on its torque converter rather than a gearset to supply the torque multiplication for acceleration. There was a two-speed planetary gearset inside, but low gear was user-selected only. There was no automated upshift in normal driving.
However, the Ultramatic added an additional refinement. Integral to the torque converter was a hefty mechanical friction clutch, which Packard called the Direct Drive Clutch. (We would know it as a torque converter clutch or lock-up converter.) Hydraulically controlled, it could engage at speeds as low as 16 mph, engaging direct drive and eliminating the odd slip-and-slide driver sensation the Dynaflow and Powerglide became famous for. Meanwhile, a throttle-coupled kickdown feature bypassed the friction clutch and reengaged the torque converter for acceleration. The Ultramatic was “first in its class,” Packard declared, “the last word in automatic, no-shift control!”
Even as the company was suffering through its final years, Packard continued to improve and refine the Ultramatic. In 1956, the last year of the “real” Packards, Touch Button control was introduced as standard on the Caribbean and as a $56 option on the rest of the product line. Unlike the mechanical Chrysler push-button shifter, the Touch Button system was electric with components supplied by Autolite.
A few years earlier in 1954, Packard had introduced what it called Gear Start Ultramatic, which included a hydraulically controlled first-gear start that eliminated the need for the driver to engage low gear. For 1955, McFarland and his assistant chief engineer John Z. Delorean developed the Twin-Ultramatic with further improvements, and in 1956, Ultramatic’s final year, Packard pioneered the pressure-cast aluminum transmission housing, which was then adopted across the auto industry over the next few years.
The Packard-powered 1956 Studebaker Golden Hawk also used the Ultramatic, as did 1955-56 Nash and Hudson cars when equipped with the Packard-supplied V8. But that was the end of the Ultramatic story. The very last Packards, the Studebaker-based “Packardbakers” of 1957-58, were equipped with Studebaker V8s and Flightomatic automatic transmissions supplied by Borg-Warner.
Another great article, in true MCG fashion, on what most take for granted today. Our 1950 Standard 8 had an Ultramatic. I read it was “available at a moderate extra cost”, $199 or $2650 today. The radio was almost $120 in comparison. It was a risky gamble as it had mighty big shoes to fill over the trusted manual. As marvelous as it was, it wasn’t the first, I believe that was Hydra Matic in 1939. However, after the war, car makers knew they were missing a huge segment of sales, women. Oh, sure, there were some women, farm gals mostly that could pull levers, but for the most part, an automatic AND power steering, opened up a whole new world for women, and car makers. Grumble as some might, the automatic, which remained a pricey option , 2nd in cost to A/C, was here to stay. In an act of defiance, it seems, some continued to buy manuals well into the 70s on the most unlikely cars. Today, I think only Toyota offers a manual in its trucks. I believe it’s what holds back sales of classic cars today anything with a manual shift.
The Ultramatic was a so-so transmission it did eliminate shifting, in true Packard quality, after sitting for almost 30 years outside, upon a mild restoration, the trans still worked, but would kill the motor at a stop sign, so a quick neutral was required. Holding it in low provided better takeoff, but I read was detrimental to the trans itself. As mentioned, there were plenty of cars to choose from, but Packard always stood out as being a bit more personal. My grandfather bought a new 1948 Packard with the Electromatic clutch, and O/D, a $129 option, that my dad said worked, well solely on its wartime contributions. He was very proud of that Packard, as we were too of ours.
Again, thanks for a wonderful article that surely hits home.
Sounds like the direct drive clutch was hanging up. Thanks for the personal memories.
Very interesting information; a considered comment.
By the time the Ultramatic was perfected with low gear breakaway, it was ruined by Autolite’s Touch Button. Unreliable at best, it refused to release park on most any grade. So bad in fact Autolite destroyed all the tooling when the contract was cancelled…
The easy solution for that is to set the parking brake firmly and let the car settle before selecting Park. You will never have a problem again.
So glad to see this current post! Just came from reading about the original location of the original factory on Mack ave, just a few miles from me. Can’t believe there isn’t a historical marker there!!?