The Next Look in Cars: 1950-51 Aero Nose Studebaker

Studebaker predicted that its 1950-51 Aero Nose models were the future of automotive styling, but the trend stuck for only two short years.

 

Today the collector-car world calls these cars “bullet-nose,” but the preferred term at Studebaker when the 1950 models rolled out was “Aero Nose.” French-born Raymond Loewy, who then held the contract to lead the South Bend automaker’s design program, told stylist Bob Bourke to make the front end “look like ze airplane.” Bourke followed Loewy’s lead right down to the simulated propeller hub, creating the most radical styling of the 1950 season. Studebaker billed it as “the next look in cars.”

Apart from the redesigned front end, the exterior sheetmetal was largely a continuation of Studebaker’s 1947 makeover, including the famous coming-and-going backlite  treatment. The chassis was mostly a carryover as well, with updated front suspension and the mid-season introduction of the Automatic Drive transmission, co-developed with Detroit Gear. Studebaker recorded its peak year in history in 1950, producing more than 343,000 cars. For 1951, the company introduced its first V8 engine (see our feature on the 1951-64 V8 here) but the sales figures, while still decent that year, were now beginning their steady march south. In 1958, production fell to less than 50,000 units.

 

Critics were genuinely excited by the 1950 Aero Nose look. Tom McCahill of Mechanix Illustrated gushed that the new Stude was the “best-looking car in its class.” Devon Francis, the esteemed automotive writer for Popular Science, offered that the pointy nose might even reduce aerodynamic drag and improve fuel economy (not likely). But as is often the case with far-out styling themes, the Aero Nose didn’t age well. Ater just two years, for ’52 the company reverted to a more conventional front end. In 1953, Studebaker would make real history with Bourke’s sensational Starliner coupe.

 

2 thoughts on “The Next Look in Cars: 1950-51 Aero Nose Studebaker

  1. The problem with “futuristic” car styling is that most buyers don’t really want anything that looks significantly different from what they are used to. I remember my father saying in the 60s that the new Jaguar XKE was “the ugliest thing he’d ever seen”. I think his statement was “I’ve thrown better looking things off fishing hooks”. Some people will buy it, but the majority won’t. So unless you are talking about an expensive low production car with a big profit margin, not enough will be sold to turn a profit for the company. Ten years later all cars might look like that and people will be lining up to buy them because they now look “modern” to them instead of “futuristic”, but that doesn’t help the company that did it first and lost sales because of it.

Comments are closed.